Ever since information technology sprung up, there have been talks about digital divide.
What exactly is the digital divide?
It is the gap between those people with effective access to digital and information technology and those without.
Social problems are inevitable in relation to the digital divide.
Firstly, on an individual level, those without access to digital and information technology lose out a lot. They are deprived of information and knowledge. But in the first place, in order to have access to information, they need the monetary capabilities. But without proper education and skills, they are unable to get a job that pays well enough to afford such simple and basic tools of communication. Technology to such people is a luxury.
This shows a virtuous cycle. In order to have access to technology and information, you need money. But to earn money, you need information and education. So only the rich are able to purchase technology, to gain more information and educate themselves and their offspring, thus generating expertise to produce even more advanced technologies.
Looking at this, there seems to be some truth about what Minister Mentor said. To quote from his speech, “you marry a non graduate, then you worry about whether or not your son or daughter is going to make it to the university.”
With the parents both holding a degree, they are assumed to be drawing a high salary. With a high salary they are able to finance a good education and also take drastic measures to shift houses in order to get their children into a good school.
We can therefore see from the above that the digital divide and the income disparity go hand in hand as social problems.
Secondly, moving to the commercial level, globalization and technology have made the world smaller (figuratively) and also made the capital markets much more deeply connected and interdependent on each other compared to the days of the barter trade.
As can be seen in the recent credit crisis, the bankruptcy of major financial institutions (e.g. Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch) affects the whole global economy. Technology has made it easier to trade overseas. Investors in Asia are investing and following the stock markets in the US. The aftershock of the credit crunch has started to spread to Europe and Asia. In fact, no county is spared because all our financial institutions are connected.
But one thing to note is that, economies with vast technologies and infrastructure are the ones whom are hardest hit. Areas with lesser technology are probably less dependent on the US economy and so the effects of the credit crunch might not reach them as quickly as the other countries.
Hence, we see that technology has made it much easier to generate wealth, but it also means that a grave mistake, as in this case the ease of lending from financial institutions, will bring the fall of investors as well.
Next, bringing in science, we see that the bulk of science and technological improvements and research centres are very much coagulated in certain countries, namely USA, Japan and Western Europe. Billions of dollars are pumped into research every year. With new breakthroughs like in vitro- fertilisation developed from such research centres, the rich (who naturally have access to information via technology) are able to overcome child-bearing issues. Whereas the poorer couples who have trouble conceiving, no matter how badly they want a child despite their current financial situations are not able to have such a method available to them.
Once again the problem of the virtuous cycle comes into the picture and the poor are deprived of making use of technological advancements.
All in all, technology doesn’t cause social problems. But we are able to see that the lack of a ubiquitous introduction of technology throughout the world actually aided in worsening the social problems that are already plaguing society and the global economies.